written by Jozmile site www.artenaonline.it
"receive and publish stressing the urgency with which the news as widely as possible, a statement sent to us by Re.Tu.Va.Sa. (Network for the Protection of Valle del Sacco). On September 17, 2010 at 19:00 in Piazza San Benedetto in Colleferro, IV km in area, the area of \u200b\u200benvironmental groups held a meeting on the Central turbigas be built in Colleferro km in area IV , on the border with the territory of Artena. We enclose a useful project information Colleferro gas turbine and the manifest of the assembly, would be useful to afflict commercial and public spaces of our city.
artenaonline.it We will do everything to be there but we can not guarantee its absolute certainty. If any of our visitors wanted to take this opportunity to follow the assembly and make a brief statement, please contact us at info@artenaonline.it, we would be truly grateful. We believe that events like this makes the project artenaonline.it useful to all citizens and we regret not being able to carry out this task in such an important moment.
TURBOGAS COLLEFERRO AND BETWEEN ARTENA
Lack of information:
Failure to timely and transparent administration in informing citizens on the design of gas turbines, has prevented the process of democratic participation which is so much talk and never apply. A right to injured citizens. The first news in the media have left no time for Democrats shared paths, nor for possible comments to the project, also preventing access to justice in environmental matters. A blatant violation of the Aarhus Convention (recognized by Italy since March 2001). In this incident shows the extent of the cultural message "of the inevitability of harm" the environment, health and economic development. To resist quest'insana and growing culture, we expose some of the considerations that lead to the reading of project documents and to do that we would have advanced if we had been given the opportunity.
Energy:
The gas turbine power station will Colleferro is not inserted or the Regional Energy Plan, nor on Provincial, tools for institutional planning in the energy sector. The request, therefore, appears to be attributable solely to the company and without proposing specific guidelines which protect the environment and public health, the risk of turning into a land of conquest Colleferro is high. This plant, in fact, is the third proposed Colleferro, the other two combined-cycle gas turbines have been proposed respectively by Edison - Fiat Energy for 846MW of power and Italgen - Italcementi for an output of 800MW. Information from our firm in 2008, the former has suspended proceedings, the second received a favorable opinion to the EIA (Environmental Impact Assessment) but not yet authorized. Then, as now, the exclusion of citizens from environmental choices, confirming a custom. It is worth mentioning that these projects were proposed in the aftermath of 2005, which stated the environmental emergency for the entire "Valley of Poison" in identifying Colleferro the epicenter of the disaster. In the face of sustainability! It would be interesting to review both the documentation of those projects, which we hope will finally fade away, and the opinions issued by the municipality at the time with their expressions of votes of the individual directors.
Inaccuracies
The motivation of the project is put in close relation to energy requirements / thermal operating in the area of \u200b\u200bthe settlements former SNIA BPD. The company proposing the list them, does not distinguish, however, those in business for those in disuse for years, as the Caffaro, as there was need to be guided by the principle, who abound more scarce. Mention of the need of energy, a company closely linked to the termocancrovalorizzatori that should produce it, has the paradoxical, exposing so ungrateful an axiom that in Colleferro rule for a decade, the use of waste through the production of energy. A sensational goal. It is only in determining which port, if that of the gas turbine, for excessive emphasis on praising the benefits of its implementation, or in the administration who quell'assioma has always exposed as the flagship. However, it is put, the point is to be allocated to the defenders of the environment. In the study, however, remains the lack of objective data of electric and thermal needs. On the thermal side, says only that the gas turbine will have a total capacity of the same order of magnitude of the current, 82 MW from the current 66MW quantifying the difference in about 20%. For us the difference, if math is not opinion, is closer to 25% (66% x 25 = 82.5). This is a detail compared to the electric side, which the company eclipsed by providing percentages and then we do. The gas turbines will produce about 40 MW from the current 3.5 MW, an increase of over 1150%, certainly not a detail, and indeed, as we shall see later, this figure is the heart of the entire project. Comparison
failure:
CHP plants combined cycle, are presented as a viable choice than the old oil or coal-fired power plants, as we offer in this comparison, a positive energy balance and environmental sustainability. In this case, we point out that in Colleferro, there is no need to dispose of any system with similar characteristics. The statement also highlights two aspects: the first is obvious, the best available technologies are more efficient than the legacy of the past, the other is linked to the possibility of an objective comparison between different technologies. At this point we note that the settlements on the roofs in the area in question, except for errors, without an installed solar panel, nor, on the ground, there are geothermal systems. These renewable technologies, which represent concrete alternatives in this matter were not considered, as well as opening disturbing questions have prevented the objective comparison of cogeneration and renewables. The priority, in our opinion, is to produce energy through renewable sources to be implemented on existing surfaces to conserve more land and joint strategies to improve efficiency in energy consumption since the property. An order of priority consistent with the current European legislation and a derivative of the member countries. The non-renewable energy sources, should be considered a second choice and methane is a renewable source. This choice is confirmed Colleferro more "capital of hell" after the termocancrovalorizzatori biomass and the system now, even the gas turbine.
Environment and Health: As far
Colleferro healthcare needs no introduction, the critical environmental issues for years untold, emerged in all their drama epidemiological survey conducted in 2005 as a result of the emergency environment. Between asbestos, betaesaclorocicloesano, PM10, dioxin, cancer mortality and morbidity outside the regional average, excess hospitalization in childhood and the poor state of water and air, we wonder how befit the gas turbine project and ethics which may have accompanied its proposal and its approval even worse. The environmental impact assessment reports as the only pollutant emitted nitrogen oxides (NOx), agent such as climate-altering carbon dioxide (CO2), while the contribution is considered irrelevant to the concentration of particulate matter (PM 10). For these technologies, however, we find non-unique views in the scientific community. The gas turbine of Mantua is the Italian example par excellence, despite the commitments the central Enipower project has encountered problems within the legal limits to contain the pollutants emitted, difficulties, and the dust suppression system that uses ammonia, the same proposal to Colleferro instead of dry deemed too expensive. From the data of the study Dr. Armaroli (CNR researcher in Bologna) and Dr. Po (medical unit operational environmental risk of Bologna), these technologies would be less "clean" than thought so far. Confirmation on the harmfulness to health also came from a joint study of University of Trento and Padua on the gas turbine Montecchio Maggiore (Vicenza), which indicates significant emissions of nitrogen oxides, carbon oxides and dust. In light of this, the analysis presented for the emission of gas turbine engines are surface Colleferro, smoky and in need of serious investigation. As for the climate-altering agents (CO2), the study promises to respect, at least theoretically, have not yet chosen the technology, the limits imposed by the Act, which multiplied by the hours of operation system (h 24) will be equal to 340,000 mg / Nm cube per year. The figure, provided it is respected, within limits prescribed by the regulations, but in the absence of a benchmark with which to compare, you can not know whether or not contribute to the improvement than at present. The only certainty there is provided by the study carried out by the company proposing the plant, when he says that the environmental quality (poor defined) will not substantially no change. Without recalling the studies on gas turbine of Mantua and Montecchio Maggiore, whether these effects are, is to be questioned on the effectiveness of the project.
Sustainability or investment?
are the 42 million euro that the banks are willing to invest, anyone who knows their proverbial prudence, is entitled to wonder who or what this amount can be guaranteed. The answer is on page 2 of the study presented by the applicant, which states that the electricity produced in excess will be exported on the open market. In a staff focus the core of the entire project. In other words, the surplus will be sold on the electricity market through the mechanism of green certificates, but there is a further guarantee all Italian anomaly. The green certificates will be withdrawn by the state not seen for a price even higher than the market price. Absurd yet it is so, without going into technical complexity, its guarantee to certain banks and earnings for the gas turbine is provided by our money, all, in fact, we pay a premium of over 7% in the electricity bill (component A3), which are the CIP 6 day old Green Certificates (CV), money that should encourage the energy produced from renewable sources and that instead, so fraudulent, they are used in an unusual way as in the case of Colleferro. Resources paid by citizens and subtracted from renewable sources to go into the pockets of the usual crafty. Banks invest because guaranteed by a reliable and fast return of the loan, the companies offering the certainty of their profits, (interesting would examine the financial plan) and we citizens, as happened in the past, which will also pay the health and environmental damage that will be left.
Every man for himself:
The site identified for the gas turbine is close to a recent settlements in which they reside primarily young couples with small children. For those new residents who do not see the guaranteed protection of their health, it also foreshadows a significant financial loss. Many are busy with costly and long-term loans and the system, which will occupy more than 4 acres with a 40 meter high chimney, we fear will lead to a dead end with no way of escape. Those who try to bring in save at least their children by selling the house, will be met with the difficulty in finding buyers and a property value drastically cut down. Situation aggravated by the existence of the debt. Also, so close that the administrative border with Artena, if the functional gas turbines to avoid a relapse of emissions on population colleferrina torn, portends an ominous future for the artenese. Once again it is confirmed Colleferro exporter of harm, after betaesaclorocicloesano with whom he has polluted land and water of entire villages in the province of Frosinone, now expanding its businesses by focusing on Artena insane. "
0 comments:
Post a Comment