Vajinas/large Vajinas

Yes to civil cases against priests

Article
28/6/2010

Pedophilia, the U.S. Supreme Court:
"No immunity for the Vatican"

NEW YORK

The Supreme Court puts the Pope in check: although mostly Catholics, the Constitutional Court of the United States paved the way for a lawsuit that could theoretically take the stand witnesses Benedict XVI and the heads of the Holy See and the Vatican to force compensation millionaires.


deciding not to consider the request of the Vatican on the case "Anonymous against the Holy See" the courts have postponed the decision to a court in Oregon if the Vatican should incur liability for the actions of pedophile priests. The abuses at the center of the case date back to 1965. The priest in question, Andrew Ronan, died in 1992.

The Vatican had asked the Court to exempt the Holy See from the trial by invoking sovereign immunity granted to foreign states under the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976, the preserve on which it was expressed welcomed the Obama administration.


This law provides for exceptions: one of these is aimed at employees of a foreign state. The Court of Appeal, in the "Anonymous against the Holy See, had accepted the plea acknowledging that Father Ronan was transferred several times in the fifties and sixties from Ireland to Chicago and then to Portland, could this be considered an employee Vatican.


"The action of the Supreme Court is a bold answer to the prayers of thousands of victims of sexual harassment of priests who finally have a chance of justice," said Jeff Anderson, a lawyer who accuses the Holy See on behalf of a man who asked to remain anonymous and who claims he was molested by Ronan when he was 15.


Disappointed Jeffrey Lena, an attorney of the Holy See would have preferred to be acknowledged that the immunity level of the Supreme Court. According to Lena, however, today's decision "does not mean that we were in error in the interpretation of the law. The courts of Washington have estimated that the case, for now, did not deserve to be examined at their level. They would not choose this case as a vehicle to clarify the law on this point. "

"Anonymous against the Holy See" is now returning to the Court District of Oregon and the discussion will concentrate Ronan was on the theory that an official of the Vatican. An argument "untenable", according to Lena, "The Holy See does not pay the salary of the priest, neither its board nor exercises daily control on his work. Ronan was a priest of the Order of Friar Servants of Mary. Its very existence was unknown to the Vatican until after the events in question. "


The lawsuit will travel a path parallel to another cause, "McBryan against the Holy See," in which lawyers have accused the Vatican asked him to bring the Pope to the bar. This week Lena opposed the request by calling the immunity law and arguing that a witness the Pope in a U.S. court "would encourage foreign courts to order the depositions of the President of the United States in cases such as those of the CIA renditions," the secret transfers of terrorism suspects after the September 11 massacres

Cost Of Laser Treatment For Eye In Malaysia

U.S. green light to process Vatican Pedophilia

Article
28/6/10

Pedophilia, Court: "No comment on" use of

The U.S. Supreme Court, in deciding not to comment on the appeal in the case of Oregon "Anonymous against the Holy See ", has removed the last obstacle to the civil trial Vatican of a case of child abuse in Oregon. According the first interpretation, the courts have recognized that the Holy See can be considered civilly liable for the actions of pedophile priests. The judges have accompanied the "no" consideration of the case without giving reasons.

The Court decided not to stop the lawsuit in which the Vatican is accused of repeatedly transferred to an Irish priest from city to city despite repeated instances of sexual molestation of minors.


The appeal to the Court was brought by the Holy See that it is demanding the right to sovereign immunity: this right, which had expressed welcome the Obama administration, was rejected over several levels of courts and ultimately by the Court of Appeal in Sacramento.


The priest at the center of the case, the Rev. Andrew Ronan, died. The lawsuit considers the Vatican shared responsibility for its abuses having moved from Ireland to Chicago and then to Portland, despite being aware of the charges against him.


lawyer of the victims: "A chance to justice"

"The Court's action is a response to the prayers of thousands of survivors of sexual harassment of priests who have a chance to finally have justice." Said Jeff Anderson, a lawyer accused the Vatican in the case 'against the Holy See Anonymous' in The Supreme Court has agreed to be considered. "We thank the judges - he added - for the courage with which they have let the lawsuit go forward. Finally there is a chance of justice, there is a chance to close the wounds."


Office of the Vatican: "We are in the right"
Jeffrey Lena, a lawyer of the Holy See would have preferred to resolve the issue at the Supreme Court, "but today's decision does not mean that we were wrong in ' interpretation of the law. " Lena said that at this point the Obama administration had given reason to the Vatican: "The courts of Washington have estimated that the case did not deserve to be examined at their level for now. "

In Jamaica What Is Cake Flour

Dublin, Murphy Report in PDF

News

Since June 1994, when the pedophile priest Brendan Smith was sentenced to four years in prison for sexual abuse of children in Northern Ireland followed three reports of abuse made child sex, children in the hands of Catholic clergy in Irish schools and institutes:

-October 2005 , the Ferns Report is a series of details of sexual abuse of children very broad, which indicates that in 'Ireland (south-east) commit acts of pedophilia.

-November 2005 , Judge Yvonne Murphy has been appointed head of a committee of investigation for child sexual abuse within the Diocese of Dublin which ended recently.

-May 2009, the report Rayan enter the specifics of the sexual abuse occurred in the orphanages and schools run by Catholic religious orders that involved the whole state.

the Dublin Archdiocese Commission of Inquiry Report LINK File site

Cover Part 1 (PDF - 161KB)

Signature Page (PDF - 111KB)

Beginning Part 1 (PDF - 39KB)

Part 1 (PDF - 161KB)

Cover Part 2 (PDF - 167Kb)

Part 2 (PDF - 2.04MB)

Cover Appendices (PDF - 163Kb)

Appendices (PDF - 965KB)

Dublin Commission welcomes the publication of his report Link in the original language

The Archdiocese of Dublin Commission of Inquiry welcomes the imminent publication of his report on the management of child sexual abuse of clergy in the diocese of Dublin in the period 1975 to 2004.

The Commission began its work at the end of March 2006 and published its report to the Minister for Justice, Equality and Law Reform in July 2009. The Commission regrets that, due to circumstances beyond its control, you can not get the entire report released at this time. As can be seen from the Judgement of Judge Gilligan issued November 19, decisions were made by the DPP, after the report is been delivered to the Minister and such decisions could not be taken into account by the Commission in its report.

The Commission is aware that a number of people will be disappointed to discover that, due to the recent instructions of the Supreme Court, the parties of the report that concern them are not published. The Commission seeks to ensure that those that publication will be created as this is a requirement of the legislation that governs all the Commissions of Inquiry. The Commission acknowledges that the complainants in question are likely to suffer the biggest disappointment. However, it should be noted that there are also people in Church and State authorities on which the actions of a complete picture is not available because of these exclusions.

For three and a half years, the Commission is in possession of highly sensitive information that has guarded carefully. It is a matter of great regret to the Commission, therefore, that the report, or parts of it were leaked in a newspaper last weekend. The Commission believes that those responsible for the loss clearly did not take into account the hardship that its partial publication might cause to the complainants and those whose actions are examined in the report.

Mary Stuart Masterson Nudity Facts

Dublin, Midnight Mass: the other two bishops resigned as protests shake the cathedral

Fried KLOTZ

Tuesday January 5, 2010
Ildialogo.org

Dublin, Ireland - In what has become a dramatic night in the midnight mass in Dublin on Christmas Eve, Archbishop Diarmuid Martin has announced that two other bishops, Ray Field and Eamon Walsh, resigned from their role in the spread of the scandal of pedophilia in the Catholic Church in Ireland.

The surprising announcement of Martin was launched from the pulpit of the cathedral city. During the ceremony, one protester shouted that the archbishop would have to "pray to God for his sins." Martin has asked the community to pray for Field and Walsh added, "pray for me."

Outside the cathedral, a protester burned a few copies of the Murphy Report - where he spoke in detail of the activities of pedophile priests and their coverage by officials of the archdiocese - said that the report was a cover, and screaming to the faithful that he and his brother had been abused by priests.

Both Walsh Field, which were named in the Murphy Report. Their resignation means that four bishops were now removed from their activities in the Archdiocese of Dublin between 1980 and 1990, when the abuses occurred.

Bishops of Limerick and Donald Murray James Moriarty of Kildare has already been made by.

A fifth, Martin Drennan of Galway, insists that he will resign.